

Google and Meta are recycling older DDR4 memory modules to mitigate severe DRAM shortages and price hikes affecting AI infrastructure deployment.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | GOOGL | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long GOOGL (other: Google and Meta are recycling older DDR4 memory modules to mitigate severe DRAM shortages and price hikes affecting AI infrastructure deployment.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | MSFT | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for MSFT → close +2.07% |
| S4 | GOOGL | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: long GOOGL at close, exit next close (other: Google and Meta are recycling older DDR4 memory modules to mitigate severe DRAM shortages and price hikes affecting AI infrastructure deployment.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 65 long lost to mat 85 long (decision 15828) for S4 GOOGL exiting 2026-09-04] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | GOOGL | ▲ long | 2 | 342.26 | 342.32 | +0.12 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL S1 | +0.63% | -0.40% | Signal: Marginally right — the bullish call did see price move up to +0.63% unrealized, so direction wasn't wrong, though the DDR4-shortage rationale's link to GOOGL upside can't be validated from this data. Timing: The fill at 342.26 was ~1.5% above prev close (337.12), while the decision-time context showed only +0.26% — so a meaningful chunk of the move occurred between decision and entry, eroding the edge. Exit: This is the dominant factor: the trade captured +$0.12 (+0.02%) against +0.63% of favorable movement available — roughly 3% of the peak unrealized gain — so the exit gave back nearly everything the (weak) signal delivered. |