

Reports indicate TSMC is holding $1 billion of finished Apple A20 Pro wafers unable to be packaged due to a DRAM shortage, potentially constraining iPhone 18 Pro inventory.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AAPL | ○ skip | — | verdict REPRICING, direction bearish -> short AAPL (product: Reports indicate TSMC is holding $1 billion of finished Apple A20 Pro wafers unable to be packaged due to a DRAM shortage, potentially constraining iPhone 18 Pro inventory.) [skipped: duplicate theme — already holding S1 short AAPL exiting 2026-08-10] → close +0.20% |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | MU | ○ skip | — | inferred long: materiality 65 below floor 75 → close -1.35% |
| S4 | AAPL | ● enter | ▼ short | overnight drift: short AAPL at close, exit next close (product: Reports indicate TSMC is holding $1 billion of finished Apple A20 Pro wafers unable to be packaged due to a DRAM shortage, potentially constraining iPhone 18 Pro inventory.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4 | AAPL | ▼ short | 3 | 307.77 | 304.88 | +8.67 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL S4 | +1.55% | -0.55% | Signal: correct. The short thesis (supply-constraint negative news) played out — AAPL fell another ~0.94% after entry, delivering +$8.67. Timing: partially late. The stock had already dropped 1.97% from prior close by entry, so a meaningful chunk of the news reaction was priced in before the fill; the trade only captured the residual drift. Exit: adequate but not optimal. Best unrealized was +1.55% versus the +0.94% realized — the mechanical next-close exit gave back roughly 40% of the peak move, while the worst drawdown (-0.55%) was never threatening. Dominant factor: correct signal on a move that was already substantially underway, with the mechanical exit capturing most but not all of what remained. |