

Micron is lobbying the White House to block Apple's plan to source memory chips from Chinese suppliers CXMT and YMTC due to national security concerns.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AAPL | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict REPRICING, direction bearish -> short AAPL (regulatory: Micron is lobbying the White House to block Apple's plan to source memory chips from Chinese suppliers CXMT and YMTC due to national security concerns.) [closed early: netted out by outranking S1 long AAPL decision 3617] |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | AAPL | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: short AAPL at close, exit next close (regulatory: Micron is lobbying the White House to block Apple's plan to source memory chips from Chinese suppliers CXMT and YMTC due to national security concerns.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 65 short lost to mat 65 short (decision 3684) for S4 AAPL exiting 2026-07-28] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AAPL | ▼ short | 2 | 335.72 | 336.11 | -0.78 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL S1 | +0.45% | -1.10% | Signal: Wrong over the holding period — the short only ever went +0.45% in the money while moving as much as −1.10% against, and it exited underwater. Whether the bearish repricing thesis would have played out on a longer horizon can't be settled here, since the exit wasn't signal-driven. Timing: Not a case of chasing a move that already happened — the stock had risen +1.01% into entry, so the short was entered before any bearish move, at an arguably favorable price for the thesis; the move simply never came. Exit: The close was mechanical (netted out by a conflicting long-AAPL decision), not a judgment on the trade. The −0.12% realized loss sits between the +0.45% best and −1.10% worst, so the forced exit neither captured the small gain available nor took the full drawdown. Dominant factor: a signal that didn't materialize, compounded by an exit dictated by an internal conflict rather than the trade's own logic — meaning this trade never got a clean test of its thesis. |