

The U.S. and China agreed to extend their trade truce by two months, deferring tariffs on industrial overcapacity and providing temporary relief to the semiconductor supply chain.
| ticker | direction | verdict | since close | 30m | day lo | day hi | intraday px |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| primary TSM | ▲ bullish | FRESH | +0.42% | -0.34% | 449.25 | 456.33 | |
| QCOM | ▲ bullish | PRICED | +3.27% | +2.45% | 195.69 | 205.77 | |
| SMCI | ▲ bullish | PRICED | +2.87% | +1.47% | 41.99 | 43.60 | |
| ASML | ▲ bullish | REPRICING | +1.29% | -0.21% | 1641.53 | 1757.71 | |
| MU | ▲ bullish | FRESH | +0.94% | -0.41% | 1074.33 | 1106.25 | |
| AMD | ▲ bullish | REPRICING | +0.86% | -0.64% | 626.27 | 641.99 | |
| AVGO | ▲ bullish | FRESH | +0.66% | -0.39% | 349.64 | 356.00 | |
| peer NVDA | ▲ bullish | FRESH | +0.18% | -0.17% | 223.35 | 226.53 |
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSM | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long TSM (regulatory: The U.S. and China agreed to extend their trade truce by two months, deferring tariffs on industrial overcapacity and providing temporary relief to the semiconductor supply chain.) [closed early: netted out by outranking S1 short TSM decision 22129] |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | NVDA | ○ skip | — | inferred long: materiality 65 below floor 75 → close +0.18% |
| S4 | TSM | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: long TSM at close, exit next close (regulatory: The U.S. and China agreed to extend their trade truce by two months, deferring tariffs on industrial overcapacity and providing temporary relief to the semiconductor supply chain.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 65 long lost to mat 85 short (decision 22132) for S4 TSM exiting 2026-09-28] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSM | ▲ long | 2 | 452.88 | 451.03 | -3.70 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSM S1 | +0.44% | -0.84% | Signal: Unclear — the position was closed early because a conflicting short signal netted it out, not because the thesis played out, so this trade doesn't cleanly test the bullish call. While open, price spent more time against the position (worst -0.84% vs. best +0.44%) and never sustained upside. Timing: Partly stale — entry came after price was already +0.42% above prev close and fading (-0.34% last 30m), and the fill at 452.88 was above even that context, so the trade bought into a pullback from a move that had largely occurred. Exit: The -0.41% realized loss sits between the +0.44% best and -0.84% worst, so the exit gave back the small available gain but avoided the full drawdown. Dominant factor: entry timing — chasing an already-priced move — compounded by a forced early exit that leaves the signal itself unresolved. |