

Palantir stock surged past $190 driven by a new U.S. Army contract, international expansion, and collaborations with Nvidia.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | PLTR | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long PLTR (other: Palantir stock surged past $190 driven by a new U.S. Army contract, international expansion, and collaborations with Nvidia.) |
| S2 | NVDA | ○ skip | — | inferred long contradicts tape: NVDA -1.37% since prev close → close +0.95% |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | PLTR | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long PLTR at close, exit next close (other: Palantir stock surged past $190 driven by a new U.S. Army contract, international expansion, and collaborations with Nvidia.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | PLTR | ▲ long | 5 | 191.76 | 192.73 | +4.85 | closed |
| S4 | PLTR | ▲ long | 5 | 192.79 | 189.72 | -15.35 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTR S1 | +1.44% | -0.17% | Signal: Right — the bullish call was correct; price moved up after entry. Timing: The cited catalyst (surge past $190) had already played out — price was flat vs. prior close (+0.00%) at decision time — but a further move still materialized, so entering "stale" news didn't hurt here. Exit: This is the dominant factor: the trade closed at +0.51% (+$4.85) against a best unrealized of +1.44%, capturing only about a third of the available move while risk was minimal (worst -0.17%). Correct signal, late-but-workable timing, weak exit. |
| PLTR S4 | +0.58% | -1.64% | Signal: Wrong — the predicted overnight upward drift didn't materialize; PLTR fell ~1.6% from entry to exit. Timing: The catalyst had already partly played out — entry at 192.79 was ~0.5% above the prior close of 191.79, so the trade paid a premium chasing news that had already moved the stock. Exit: The mechanical next-close exit realized -1.59%, nearly the worst unrealized (-1.64%), while the best available was only +0.58% — so even a perfect exit would have yielded little. Dominant factor: the signal was simply wrong — the news-driven pop faded rather than drifted higher, and no exit rule could have salvaged much given the shallow +0.58% peak. |