

ASML reported a strong Q2 2026 with revenue up 21.3% year-over-year and raised full-year guidance to €43-45 billion, driven by surging demand for memory lithography systems.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | ASML | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long ASML (earnings: ASML reported a strong Q2 2026 with revenue up 21.3% year-over-year and raised full-year guidance to €43-45 billion, driven by surging demand for memory lithography systems.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | TSM | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for TSM → close +0.25% |
| S4 | ASML | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long ASML at close, exit next close (earnings: ASML reported a strong Q2 2026 with revenue up 21.3% year-over-year and raised full-year guidance to €43-45 billion, driven by surging demand for memory lithography systems.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | ASML | ▲ long | 1 | 1618.24 | 1630.40 | +12.16 | closed |
| S4 | ASML | ▲ long | 1 | 1630.89 | 1677.29 | +46.40 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML S1 | +0.78% | -0.06% | Signal: Correct — the bullish call played out, with the trade never going more than -0.06% underwater. Timing: Partly late — about +1% of the earnings move had already occurred by entry (fill 1618.24 vs prev close 1602.22), though the last-30m read of +0.06% suggests the pop had stalled rather than being chased mid-spike; whether more upside existed before entry isn't determinable from this data. Exit: Near-optimal — the +0.75% realized gain captured almost all of the +0.78% best unrealized. Dominant factor: a correct signal executed cleanly; the only cost was the ~1% of the move already priced in before entry. |
| ASML S4 | +2.94% | -0.52% | Signal: Right — the post-earnings long drifted up another +2.85% from entry to exit. Timing: Some of the move was already gone — the stock was +0.98% at decision time and the fill (1630.89) was ~1.8% above prev close, so entry paid up beyond the known context — but plenty of drift remained. Exit: Near-optimal — +2.85% realized against a +2.94% best unrealized, with only -0.52% adverse excursion. Dominant factor: a correct signal with an exit that captured essentially everything available; the only leakage was the slippage/gap between decision-time price and the fill. |