
Taiwan Semiconductor reported a record 53.3% year-over-year increase in August revenue driven by robust AI demand and raised its full-year revenue growth forecast to above 40%.
| ticker | direction | verdict | since close | 30m | day lo | day hi | intraday px |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| primary TSM | ▲ bullish | FRESH | +0.40% | +0.10% | 428.19 | 435.24 | |
| ASML | ▲ bullish | REPRICING | +1.98% | +0.05% | 1697.22 | 1735.95 | |
| AMD | ▲ bullish | REPRICING | +1.13% | +0.25% | 505.97 | 521.00 | |
| MU | ▲ bullish | REPRICING | +1.06% | +0.25% | 969.79 | 997.40 | |
| QCOM | ▲ bullish | FRESH | +0.70% | +0.07% | 169.68 | 185.29 | |
| AVGO | ▲ bullish | FRESH | +0.65% | -0.03% | 361.39 | 366.09 | |
| peer NVDA | ▲ bullish | FRESH | +0.60% | -0.15% | 218.18 | 221.70 |
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSM | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long TSM (earnings: Taiwan Semiconductor reported a record 53.3% year-over-year increase in August revenue driven by robust AI demand and raised its full-year revenue growth forecast to above 40%.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | NVDA | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long NVDA (earnings: Taiwan Semiconductor reported a record 53.3% year-over-year increase in August revenue driven by robust AI demand and raised its full-year revenue growth forecast to above 40%.) |
| S4 | TSM | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long TSM at close, exit next close (earnings: Taiwan Semiconductor reported a record 53.3% year-over-year increase in August revenue driven by robust AI demand and raised its full-year revenue growth forecast to above 40%.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSM | ▲ long | 2 | 429.69 | 432.71 | +6.04 | closed |
| S3 | NVDA | ▲ long | 4 | 220.20 | 218.60 | -6.40 | closed |
| S4 | TSM | ▲ long | 2 | 432.93 | 419.76 | -26.34 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSM S1 | +1.31% | -0.09% | Signal: Correct — the bullish call played out; the trade never went meaningfully against the position (worst -0.09%). Timing: Fine — at entry the stock was only +0.40% above prior close, so the anticipated move had not already occurred. Exit: The weak link. The trade captured +0.70% (entry 429.69 → exit 432.71) against a best unrealized of +1.31%, so roughly half of the available move was given back or left on the table. Dominant factor: exit capture, not signal or timing — the direction and entry were sound, but the exit realized only about 54% of the peak gain. |
| NVDA S3 | +0.78% | -0.88% | Signal: Wrong over the holding period — the bullish TSMC-driven thesis produced no sustained upside; the max gain available was only +0.78% before the stock rolled over to a loss. Timing: Partly stale — the stock was already +0.60% on the day at decision time and the fill at 220.2 was ~+0.84% above prev close, so entry chased an already-elevated price; whether the TSMC news itself was fully priced in earlier isn't determinable from this data. Exit: The exit at -0.73% sits near the worst unrealized (-0.88%) and gave back the entire +0.78% peak, but even a perfect exit would have yielded a small gain. Dominant factor: signal failure — the predicted direction simply didn't materialize in any meaningful size, making timing and exit secondary. |
| TSM S4 | +0.17% | -3.83% | Signal: Wrong. The predicted overnight upward drift never materialized — best unrealized was only +0.17% while the stock fell as much as -3.83%. Timing: The decision-time context showed only +0.40% since prior close, but the fill at 432.93 was +1.09% above the 428.28 prior close, so roughly 0.7% of adverse slippage/pop occurred between decision and entry — some of the news reaction was already paid for at entry. Exit: The fixed next-close exit at -3.04% landed near the worst unrealized (-3.83%) with essentially no upside ever available to capture; the dominant factor is signal failure — the earnings-driven drift thesis simply didn't play out, and no exit rule would have salvaged this trade. |