

Alphabet's Google has implemented changes to its European search results to comply with EU antitrust regulations, warning that the move will degrade user experience and increase costs for businesses.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | GOOGL | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short GOOGL (regulatory: Alphabet's Google has implemented changes to its European search results to comply with EU antitrust regulations, warning that the move will degrade user experience and increase costs for businesses.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | META | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for META → close +0.10% |
| S4 | GOOGL | ● enter | ▼ short | overnight drift: short GOOGL at close, exit next close (regulatory: Alphabet's Google has implemented changes to its European search results to comply with EU antitrust regulations, warning that the move will degrade user experience and increase costs for businesses.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | GOOGL | ▼ short | 2 | 335.97 | 338.53 | -5.12 | closed |
| S4 | GOOGL | ▼ short | 2 | 338.40 | 330.53 | +15.74 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL S1 | +0.80% | -1.09% | Signal: Wrong — the bearish call didn't play out; GOOGL rose ~0.76% against the short during the hold. Timing: The stock was already down 0.58% from prior close at entry, so part of any bearish reaction to the news may have been priced in, though the data here can't confirm the news itself caused that dip. Exit: Poor — the trade saw +0.80% unrealized in its favor at best, but exited at -0.76%, close to the worst unrealized of -1.09%, capturing essentially the bottom of what was available. Dominant factor: bad signal — the direction was simply wrong, and the exit near the worst point compounded it, but no exit timing would have saved a thesis that never materialized beyond a brief +0.80% blip. |
| GOOGL S4 | +7.01% | -0.29% | Signal: Right — GOOGL fell after entry and the short was never meaningfully underwater (worst unrealized just -0.29%). Timing: Fine — only -0.58% had moved by decision time and entry filled essentially at prior close, so the move was still ahead. Exit: The weak link — the trade banked ~+2.3% (+$15.74) while the position saw +7.01% unrealized at its best, so the fixed next-close exit gave back roughly two-thirds of the available move. Dominant factor: exit efficiency, not signal or timing. (Whether the regulatory news actually drove the drop isn't determinable from this data.) |