

SemiAnalysis verified benchmarks showing OpenAI's custom Jalapeño chip significantly outperforms Nvidia's GB300 in efficiency and latency ahead of Nvidia's earnings report.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | NVDA | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short NVDA (product: SemiAnalysis verified benchmarks showing OpenAI's custom Jalapeño chip significantly outperforms Nvidia's GB300 in efficiency and latency ahead of Nvidia's earnings report.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | AMD | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long AMD (product: SemiAnalysis verified benchmarks showing OpenAI's custom Jalapeño chip significantly outperforms Nvidia's GB300 in efficiency and latency ahead of Nvidia's earnings report.) [closed early: netted out by outranking S3 short AMD decision 13403] |
| S4 | NVDA | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: short NVDA at close, exit next close (product: SemiAnalysis verified benchmarks showing OpenAI's custom Jalapeño chip significantly outperforms Nvidia's GB300 in efficiency and latency ahead of Nvidia's earnings report.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 85 short lost to mat 90 long (decision 13404) for S4 NVDA exiting 2026-08-27] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | NVDA | ▼ short | 4 | 212.44 | 209.71 | +10.92 | closed |
| S3 | AMD | ▲ long | 2 | 484.58 | 482.94 | -3.28 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA S1 | +1.40% | -0.52% | Signal: Right — the bearish call played out, with NVDA falling ~1.3% from entry. Timing: Fresh — price context at decision time (-0.11% since prev close, +0.04% last 30m) shows the move had not yet occurred. Exit: Strong — the +10.92 P&L (~+1.29%) captured nearly all of the +1.40% best unrealized, with only -0.52% adverse drawdown along the way. Dominant factor: correct signal on a fresh entry, with an exit that harvested almost the entire available move — this trade worked as intended on all three dimensions. Note the entry rationale rests on an unverified journal claim (the "Jalapeño chip" story), so whether the thesis itself was sound versus lucky can't be settled from this data. |
| AMD S3 | +1.24% | -0.61% | Signal: Directionally right, at least briefly — the trade reached +1.24% unrealized, so the bullish call had something to capture. (Whether the rationale's logic holds is another matter: a non-Nvidia custom chip beating Nvidia is an odd basis for an AMD long, but the data here can't settle that.) Timing: Partly stale — decision-time context showed AMD at -0.88% (479.18), yet the fill came at 484.58, ~1.1% higher, meaning a meaningful chunk of the move occurred between decision and entry. Exit: This is the dominant factor. The position was closed not on merit but because it was netted out against a competing short decision, exiting at -0.34% and turning an available +1.24% into a -$3.28 loss — the exit captured none of what the trade offered. |