

Nvidia reported Q1 fiscal 2027 revenue of $81.6 billion, an 85% year-over-year increase, while its stock valuation multiples have contracted relative to historical averages.
| ticker | direction | verdict | since close | 30m | day lo | day hi | intraday px |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| primary NVDA | ▲ bullish | FRESH | -0.09% | +0.21% | 208.18 | 215.45 | |
| MU | · unclear | PRICED | -2.97% | +0.31% | 888.00 | 941.45 | |
| SMCI | · unclear | REPRICING | -1.88% | +0.77% | 34.15 | 36.55 | |
| peer AMD | · unclear | REPRICING | -1.49% | +0.56% | 452.68 | 468.25 | |
| QCOM | · unclear | FRESH | -0.90% | +0.07% | 156.50 | 159.84 | |
| AVGO | · unclear | FRESH | -0.83% | +0.20% | 358.35 | 366.57 | |
| TSM | · unclear | FRESH | -0.46% | +0.38% | 405.51 | 417.82 | |
| ASML | · unclear | FRESH | -0.24% | +0.28% | 1729.07 | 1762.59 |
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | NVDA | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long NVDA (earnings: Nvidia reported Q1 fiscal 2027 revenue of $81.6 billion, an 85% year-over-year increase, while its stock valuation multiples have contracted relative to historical averages.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | AMD | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for AMD → close -2.25% |
| S4 | NVDA | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: long NVDA at close, exit next close (earnings: Nvidia reported Q1 fiscal 2027 revenue of $81.6 billion, an 85% year-over-year increase, while its stock valuation multiples have contracted relative to historical averages.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 85 long lost to mat 85 short (decision 12500) for S4 NVDA exiting 2026-08-25] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | NVDA | ▲ long | 4 | 214.59 | 208.46 | -24.52 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA S1 | -0.16% | -3.20% | Signal (dominant factor): The bullish call was simply wrong — the trade never went positive (best unrealized only -0.16%) and NVDA fell steadily after entry, so the earnings-driven upside thesis didn't play out in the holding window. Timing: Not the issue — price was essentially flat at entry (-0.09% from prior close, +0.21% last 30m), so the trade wasn't chasing a move that had already occurred. Exit: The -2.86% realized loss sits near the worst unrealized (-3.20%), but with the best point being only -0.16%, there was almost nothing better available to capture; the exit is a symptom of the bad signal, not an independent failure. Whether an earlier stop was possible under the strategy's rules isn't determinable from this data. |