
/A%20close-up%20of%20an%20AMD%20office%20by%20gehapromo%20via%20Adobe%20Stock.jpeg)
Reports indicate Google is collaborating with AMD to develop its next-generation TPU, potentially shifting custom AI chip development away from Broadcom and Intel.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AMD | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict REPRICING, direction bullish -> long AMD (partnership: Reports indicate Google is collaborating with AMD to develop its next-generation TPU, potentially shifting custom AI chip development away from Broadcom and Intel.) |
| S2 | GOOGL | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for GOOGL → close -0.14% |
| S3 | NVDA | ○ skip | — | inferred short: materiality 65 below floor 75 → close -0.15% |
| S4 | AMD | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long AMD at close, exit next close (partnership: Reports indicate Google is collaborating with AMD to develop its next-generation TPU, potentially shifting custom AI chip development away from Broadcom and Intel.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AMD | ▲ long | 2 | 465.00 | 468.56 | +7.12 | closed |
| S4 | AMD | ▲ long | 2 | 468.38 | 473.91 | +11.06 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD S1 | +0.81% | -0.02% | Signal: Right — the bullish call paid off; price rose from 465.0 to 468.56 (+0.77%). Whether the move was actually driven by the Google/AMD TPU story can't be determined from this data. Timing: Good — entry at 465.0 was below the prior close (466.42), and the worst unrealized drawdown was only -0.02%, so the trade was not chasing an already-completed move. Exit: Near-perfect capture — +0.77% realized against a best unrealized of +0.81%, leaving essentially nothing on the table. The dominant factor here is a correct directional signal executed cleanly; nothing in this trade's data points to a flaw. |
| AMD S4 | +1.95% | -1.11% | Signal: Correct — the long thesis played out, with AMD rising ~1.2% from entry to exit. Timing: Mostly fine — entry at 468.38 was only ~0.4% above the prior close of 466.42, so little of the move had been consumed before the fill (though the +0.64% last-30m drift suggests some momentum was already underway). Exit: The mechanical next-close exit captured +1.18% against a best unrealized of +1.95%, so roughly 60% of the peak was banked; the -1.11% drawdown was ridden through without harm. Dominant factor: signal quality — the directional call was right and drove the profit; the exit rule left about a third of the available gain on the table, which is a secondary observation, not the story of this trade. |