

Palantir reported Q2 FY26 earnings with EPS beating estimates by 46% and U.S. commercial revenue surging 149%, leading to a raised full-year revenue guidance.
| ticker | direction | verdict | since close | 30m | day lo | day hi | intraday px |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| primary PLTR | ▲ bullish | FRESH | -0.17% | +0.23% | 172.20 | 176.01 | |
| AMZN | · unclear | REPRICING | -1.73% | +0.18% | 260.11 | 266.47 | |
| GOOGL | · unclear | REPRICING | -1.53% | +0.08% | 338.89 | 344.30 | |
| MSFT | · unclear | FRESH | -0.65% | +0.23% | 479.99 | 485.50 | |
| peer NVDA | · unclear | FRESH | -0.63% | -0.30% | 215.96 | 219.30 | |
| META | · unclear | FRESH | -0.52% | -0.10% | 539.90 | 549.79 |
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | PLTR | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long PLTR (earnings: Palantir reported Q2 FY26 earnings with EPS beating estimates by 46% and U.S. commercial revenue surging 149%, leading to a raised full-year revenue guidance.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | NVDA | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for NVDA → close +0.14% |
| S4 | PLTR | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long PLTR at close, exit next close (earnings: Palantir reported Q2 FY26 earnings with EPS beating estimates by 46% and U.S. commercial revenue surging 149%, leading to a raised full-year revenue guidance.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | PLTR | ▲ long | 5 | 174.73 | 174.27 | -2.30 | closed |
| S4 | PLTR | ▲ long | 5 | 174.64 | 180.24 | +28.00 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTR S1 | +0.92% | -0.33% | Signal: The bullish call was directionally right in the short run — the position reached +0.92% unrealized, well above the -0.33% worst case, so upside was available. Timing: The price context (-0.17% since prev close, +0.23% last 30m) shows no pre-entry surge, though whether the earnings pop had already been priced in on prior days can't be determined from this data. Exit (dominant factor): The trade closed at -0.26% (-$2.30) after peaking at +0.92%, meaning the exit gave back the entire available gain and then some — the loss came from exit execution, not from a wrong directional call. |
| PLTR S4 | +4.35% | -6.39% | Signal: Right — the long call on the earnings beat paid off, with price closing up +3.2% from entry. Timing: The move had not already happened at entry (price was flat, -0.17% vs. prior close), so entry captured the drift as intended — though the -6.39% worst unrealized shows the position endured a severe adverse swing while open. Exit: The next-close exit captured +3.21% against a best unrealized of +4.35%, i.e., most of what was available. Dominant factor: correct signal with a well-timed entry; the mechanical exit gave back only ~1.1pp of the peak. The data here doesn't show when the -6.39% drawdown occurred, so whether the trade was ever near a plausible stop-out can't be settled from this record. |