

Meta has become one of Microsoft's largest AI customers, spending hundreds of millions annually on Azure access for AI model consumption.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | MSFT | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long MSFT (partnership: Meta has become one of Microsoft's largest AI customers, spending hundreds of millions annually on Azure access for AI model consumption.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | GOOGL | ○ skip | — | inferred short: materiality 65 below floor 75 → close -0.60% |
| S4 | MSFT | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: long MSFT at close, exit next close (partnership: Meta has become one of Microsoft's largest AI customers, spending hundreds of millions annually on Azure access for AI model consumption.) [skipped at close: s4_alignment — wanted long, MSFT -0.62% vs prev close 484.30999755859375 (mark 481.30499267578125), order not placed] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | MSFT | ▲ long | 2 | 483.18 | 481.25 | -3.86 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT S1 | +0.17% | -0.72% | Signal: Wrong — the bullish call didn't materialize; the stock never gained more than +0.17% while open and drifted down ~0.4% to exit. Timing: Indeterminate from this data — pre-entry drift was mildly negative (-0.17% since prior close), but nothing here shows when the Meta/Azure news broke or whether it was already priced in. Exit: Reasonable given what was available — the -0.40% realized loss sits between the +0.17% peak and -0.72% trough, so there was almost nothing to capture and the exit avoided the worst. The dominant factor is a bad signal: the bullish thesis simply didn't move the stock. |