

App developers filed an opposition brief against Apple's motion to dismiss a US complaint alleging violation of an injunction regarding App Store commission structures.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AAPL | ○ skip | — | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short AAPL (regulatory: App developers filed an opposition brief against Apple's motion to dismiss a US complaint alleging violation of an injunction regarding App Store commission structures.) [skipped: duplicate theme — already holding S1 short AAPL exiting 2026-08-06] → close +0.23% |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | GOOGL | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for GOOGL → close +0.28% |
| S4 | AAPL | ● enter | ▼ short | overnight drift: short AAPL at close, exit next close (regulatory: App developers filed an opposition brief against Apple's motion to dismiss a US complaint alleging violation of an injunction regarding App Store commission structures.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4 | AAPL | ▼ short | 3 | 312.63 | 313.95 | -3.96 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL S4 | +0.64% | -0.69% | Signal: wrong. The short predicted overnight downside on the regulatory news, but AAPL rose from 312.63 to 313.95 (-0.42% against the position), so the directional call failed. Timing: not the issue. Price was only +0.35% above prior close at decision time — the adverse move happened after entry, not before it. Exit: gave back what was available. The position was briefly +0.64% in the money, but the mechanical next-close exit landed near the worst unrealized (-0.69%), so essentially all the transient favorable move was surrendered. The dominant factor is the wrong directional signal; the exit merely locked in a loss close to the maximum drawdown seen while open. |