

Internal Meta research revealed in court shows parental controls on Threads fail to reduce teen compulsive use, complicating the company's defense in an ongoing federal addiction trial.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | META | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict REPRICING, direction bearish -> short META (regulatory: Internal Meta research revealed in court shows parental controls on Threads fail to reduce teen compulsive use, complicating the company's defense in an ongoing federal addiction trial.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | META | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: short META at close, exit next close (regulatory: Internal Meta research revealed in court shows parental controls on Threads fail to reduce teen compulsive use, complicating the company's defense in an ongoing federal addiction trial.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 65 short lost to mat 65 short (decision 3736) for S4 META exiting 2026-07-28] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | META | ▼ short | 1 | 601.20 | 593.93 | +7.27 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| META S1 | +1.29% | -0.08% | Signal: correct. The bearish call played out — META fell from 601.20 to 593.93, and the entry price above the prior close (+1.01% on the day) suggests the move had not already happened; the short caught the decline rather than chasing it. Exit: near-optimal. Best unrealized was +1.29% (~$7.76 on the entry price) and the trade banked +$7.27 (~1.21%), capturing nearly all of the available move with essentially no adverse excursion (-0.08%). Dominant factor: a correct directional signal, cleanly timed and cleanly exited — this trade worked as designed on all three dimensions. One caveat: the data doesn't show whether the stock kept falling after exit, so whether the exit left further downside uncaptured can't be settled here. |