

TSMC to get 6th straight record profit quarter
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSM | ○ skip | — | primary long contradicts tape: TSM -1.01% since prev close → close -0.70% |
| S2 | AAPL | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for AAPL → close +0.19% |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | TSM | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long TSM at close, exit next close (earnings: TSMC to get 6th straight record profit quarter) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4 | TSM | ▲ long | 2 | 445.58 | 444.78 | -1.60 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSM S4 | -0.06% | -1.80% | Signal: The predicted upward overnight drift didn't materialize — TSM closed next day at 444.78 vs. 445.58 entry (−0.18%), essentially flat-to-down, so the direction was wrong, though marginally; the rationale is an anticipatory headline ("to get 6th straight record quarter"), and nothing here shows whether the actual report hit or what the stock's reaction was, so whether the thesis was priced-in versus simply not reacting isn't settled by this data. Timing: No run-up had occurred — the stock was down 1.01% on the day at decision time, and the fill (445.58) came in another ~0.7% below the decision-time price (~448.65 implied), so if anything entry was at a weaker level than planned, which rules out "move already happened" as the problem. Exit: The trade never went positive (best unrealized −0.06%, worst −1.80%), and the mechanical next-close exit at −0.18% captured close to the best available, so exit execution is not the issue. Dominant factor: signal — the expected post-earnings drift simply didn't show up. |