

Alphabet (GOOGL) Locks In $4.3 Billion Nuclear Power Deal For AI Data Centers
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | GOOGL | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long GOOGL (partnership: Alphabet (GOOGL) Locks In $4.3 Billion Nuclear Power Deal For AI Data Centers) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | GOOGL | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long GOOGL at close, exit next close (partnership: Alphabet (GOOGL) Locks In $4.3 Billion Nuclear Power Deal For AI Data Centers) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | GOOGL | ▲ long | 2 | 345.39 | 350.60 | +10.42 | closed |
| S4 | GOOGL | ▲ long | 2 | 350.63 | 347.96 | -5.34 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL S1 | +1.55% | -0.01% | Signal was right: the bullish call on the nuclear-power deal played out, with GOOGL rising from the 345.39 entry to a 350.6 exit (+1.51%). Timing was fine — the stock was actually down 0.67% from the prior close at decision time with only +0.17% in the last 30 minutes, so the move had not already happened; entry was below the prior close and the trade never went meaningfully against it (worst unrealized -0.01%). The exit captured nearly everything available: +1.51% realized versus +1.55% best unrealized, so the dominant factor here is simply a correct signal executed cleanly, with nothing in this data pointing to a deficiency. |
| GOOGL S4 | +1.62% | -1.16% | Signal: weak at best — the stock finished the holding window at 347.96, essentially flat against the prior close of 347.70 (+0.07%), so the predicted post-news drift barely materialized on a close-to-close basis. Timing is the dominant factor: at decision time the stock was -0.67% from prior close (~345.4), but the fill came at 350.63, roughly 1.5% higher, meaning the pop the trade was meant to ride occurred between the decision and the entry and the position was opened at a local high. Exit: the mechanical next-close exit left the +1.62% peak uncaptured and closed near the -1.16% trough (-0.76%); the data doesn't show when that peak occurred, so whether an earlier exit was realistically reachable isn't settled here. |