

Micron says RAM shortages will drag into 2028, and customers face 'much higher prices'
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | MU | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long MU (guidance: Micron says RAM shortages will drag into 2028, and customers face 'much higher prices') |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | MU | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long MU at close, exit next close (guidance: Micron says RAM shortages will drag into 2028, and customers face 'much higher prices') |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | MU | ▲ long | 1 | 1069.76 | 1049.09 | -20.67 | closed |
| S4 | MU | ▲ long | 1 | 1049.77 | 1086.26 | +36.49 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| MU S1 | +0.30% | -2.18% | Signal: the bullish read on the Micron shortage/pricing guidance did not play out over the holding period — the stock fell 1.93% from fill to exit and the best unrealized was only +0.30%, so the direction was wrong for this trade's window. Timing: the move already priced in before the decision was modest (+0.65% from prev close, +0.31% in the prior 30m), but the fill at 1069.76 was another ~0.67% above the decision-time context, so entry chased into a small extension; whether the news itself was stale isn't settled by the data here. Exit: the -1.93% realized loss sits near the worst unrealized (-2.18%), meaning the exit gave back essentially the full adverse move and captured none of the brief +0.30% upside — the dominant factor is a failed bullish signal, with no evidence of an edge in exit management. |
| MU S4 | +3.74% | -3.57% | Signal: The predicted direction was right — MU closed the next session at 1086.26, up ~3.5% from the 1049.77 fill, with the mechanical next-close exit capturing nearly all of the +3.74% best unrealized (and the trade also sat through a -3.57% drawdown, so the path was volatile and the symmetric swing makes it hard to say the news thesis, rather than noise, drove the result). Timing: The move had not already happened at decision time (only +0.65% since prev close), and the fill at 1049.77 was actually ~1.2% below the prior close and ~1.8% below the price implied at decision time — the data doesn't explain that gap (late-session drop vs. fill/data discrepancy), so timing is favorable but the entry price itself is unresolved. Dominant factor: correct direction with a near-perfect exit capture; the rationale's longer-term guidance claim neither explains the intraday round trip nor is needed to explain the outcome. |