

Warning issued over Tesla battery system 'fire risk' - is yours affected?
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSLA | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short TSLA (regulatory: Warning issued over Tesla battery system 'fire risk' - is yours affected?) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | TSLA | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: short TSLA at close, exit next close (regulatory: Warning issued over Tesla battery system 'fire risk' - is yours affected?) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 73 short lost to mat 77 short (decision 23644) for S4 TSLA exiting 2026-09-30] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSLA | ▼ short | 2 | 356.70 | 353.04 | +7.32 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA S1 | +1.39% | +0.31% | Signal: Correct — the short was taken bearish and TSLA fell ~1.0% from fill to exit, so the direction call held (whether the battery-warning article actually drove the move can't be established from this data). Timing: At decision time the stock was still up (+0.52% vs prev close, +0.21% in the last 30m), so the move had not already happened; however, the fill at 356.70 was roughly 0.7% below the implied decision-time price (~359.3), meaning some of the drop occurred between decision and fill — the journal doesn't record the fill delay, so how much was missed is unsettled. Exit: Realized +1.03% against a best unrealized of +1.39% and a worst of +0.31% (the trade was never underwater), so the exit captured about three-quarters of what was available. The dominant factor here is simply a correct signal on a trade that went one way from the start; the exit left a modest ~0.36% on the table. |