

Amazon has selected Qualcomm to design custom AI chips in a deal potentially worth up to $60 billion, bypassing rival Marvell Technology.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | QCOM | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict REPRICING, direction bullish -> long QCOM (partnership: Amazon has selected Qualcomm to design custom AI chips in a deal potentially worth up to $60 billion, bypassing rival Marvell Technology.) |
| S2 | AMZN | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for AMZN → close +0.21% |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | QCOM | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long QCOM at close, exit next close (partnership: Amazon has selected Qualcomm to design custom AI chips in a deal potentially worth up to $60 billion, bypassing rival Marvell Technology.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | QCOM | ▲ long | 5 | 176.29 | 176.17 | -0.60 | closed |
| S4 | QCOM | ▲ long | 5 | 176.20 | 177.20 | +5.00 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM S1 | +0.43% | -0.71% | Timing is the dominant factor. The entry chased a move already underway (+1.31% from prev close, +0.43% in the prior 30 minutes), buying at 176.29 against a 174.09 prior close, so much of the immediate repricing was likely captured before the fill. Signal: during the holding window the bullish direction never confirmed — the stock topped out at +0.43% unrealized and dipped to -0.71%, so the data here shows chop, not a validated or invalidated thesis (whether the news repriced QCOM later is not settled by this window). Exit: the -0.60 USD result (-0.07%) landed near the middle of a tight ±0.5–0.7% range, meaning the exit gave up little because there was little available to capture; the problem was paying up at entry, not the exit. |
| QCOM S4 | +3.29% | -3.73% | Signal: Right — QCOM closed higher than entry, consistent with the partnership thesis. Timing: Partly chased — entry at 176.20 was already +1.21% above the 174.09 prev close, so a chunk of the news pop was absorbed before fill. Exit: This is the dominant factor — the trade captured +0.57% (+$5) against a best unrealized of +3.29% (~+$29 on this position), so the mechanical next-close exit gave back roughly five-sixths of the available gain, though it also sat through a -3.73% drawdown that the fixed hold happened to survive. The data doesn't show when the peak/trough occurred intraday, so whether an earlier exit was practically reachable isn't settled here. |