
Palantir has designated Nebius as its preferred sovereign AI infrastructure partner.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | PLTR | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long PLTR (partnership: Palantir has designated Nebius as its preferred sovereign AI infrastructure partner.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | PLTR | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: long PLTR at close, exit next close (partnership: Palantir has designated Nebius as its preferred sovereign AI infrastructure partner.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 65 long lost to mat 65 long (decision 16976) for S4 PLTR exiting 2026-09-09] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | PLTR | ▲ long | 5 | 174.27 | 170.15 | -20.60 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTR S1 | +0.59% | -2.35% | Signal (dominant factor): The bullish call was simply wrong over the holding period — PLTR fell ~2.4% and the best the trade ever showed was +0.59%, so there was never a meaningful move in the predicted direction to capture. Timing: Entry doesn't look late — price was flat vs. prior close (-0.05%) with only +0.20% in the prior 30 minutes, so the data doesn't suggest the move had already happened; whether the news was already priced in earlier isn't determinable from what's here. Exit: The exit at -2.36% is essentially at the worst unrealized level (-2.35%), meaning the trade was closed at roughly the bottom of its range — but given the max favorable excursion was only +0.59%, even a perfect exit would have salvaged little; the loss is attributable to the signal, not the exit mechanics. |