

Google avoided a court-ordered breakup of its ad tech business for the second time while rolling out AI search features and addressing various platform bugs.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | GOOGL | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long GOOGL (regulatory: Google avoided a court-ordered breakup of its ad tech business for the second time while rolling out AI search features and addressing various platform bugs.) |
| S2 | MSFT | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for MSFT → close -1.43% |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | GOOGL | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: long GOOGL at close, exit next close (regulatory: Google avoided a court-ordered breakup of its ad tech business for the second time while rolling out AI search features and addressing various platform bugs.) [skipped at close: s4_alignment — wanted long, GOOGL -1.25% vs prev close 342.4800109863281 (mark 338.19000244140625), order not placed] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | GOOGL | ▲ long | 2 | 342.70 | 338.16 | -9.08 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL S1 | -0.23% | -1.61% | Signal (dominant factor): The bullish call was simply wrong — the position was never meaningfully positive (best unrealized only -0.23%), so the predicted direction failed outright rather than being a stale entry; the +0.10%/-0.20% pre-entry context shows no significant move had already occurred. Exit: The exit at -1.32% sits near the worst unrealized (-1.61%), but with a best of -0.23% there was essentially nothing to capture — exit quality is a minor footnote given the signal failure. Timing: Not an issue here; the entry wasn't late to a move, the move just never came. Whether the regulatory news was already priced in before the prior close can't be determined from this data. |