
Amazon shares entered correction territory following an FTC lawsuit alleging $20 billion in advertiser overcharges through undisclosed reserve-pricing mechanisms.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AMZN | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short AMZN (regulatory: Amazon shares entered correction territory following an FTC lawsuit alleging $20 billion in advertiser overcharges through undisclosed reserve-pricing mechanisms.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | GOOGL | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for GOOGL → close +0.71% |
| S4 | AMZN | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: short AMZN at close, exit next close (regulatory: Amazon shares entered correction territory following an FTC lawsuit alleging $20 billion in advertiser overcharges through undisclosed reserve-pricing mechanisms.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 65 short lost to mat 65 short (decision 15484) for S4 AMZN exiting 2026-09-03] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AMZN | ▼ short | 3 | 253.68 | 254.84 | -3.48 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN S1 | -0.10% | -0.96% | Signal (dominant factor): The bearish call was simply wrong over the holding period — AMZN rose from 253.68 to 254.84, and the position was underwater essentially the entire time (best unrealized was still -0.10%), so no profitable exit ever existed. Timing: The rationale claims shares had "entered correction territory," which suggests the drop may have already occurred before entry, but the decision-time context (-0.12% since prev close, +0.06% last 30m) shows no fresh move to fade or ride — the data here doesn't settle whether the news was already priced in, though the flat tape at entry is consistent with a stale story. Exit: The exit at -0.46% landed mid-range between the best (-0.10%) and worst (-0.96%) unrealized, so exit execution was neither the problem nor a save — the trade was a loser at every point, making this a signal failure, not an exit failure. |