
AMD reported record Q2 revenue of $11.5 billion with data center sales doubling, driven by an expected 80% year-over-year growth in traditional server CPU shipments for the second half of 2026.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AMD | ○ skip | — | verdict PRICED — Δ prev close -3.71% · Δ 30m -0.33% · px 466.42 (prev 484.39) → close +0.09% |
| S2 | MSFT | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for MSFT → close +0.17% |
| S3 | NVDA | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short NVDA (earnings: AMD reported record Q2 revenue of $11.5 billion with data center sales doubling, driven by an expected 80% year-over-year growth in traditional server CPU shipments for the second half of 2026.) |
| S4 | AMD | ○ skip | — | verdict PRICED — Δ prev close -3.71% · Δ 30m -0.33% · px 466.42 (prev 484.39) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S3 | NVDA | ▼ short | 4 | 218.86 | 217.13 | +6.92 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA S3 | +0.79% | -0.49% | Signal: The bearish call was directionally correct — NVDA fell from 218.86 to 217.13 while the trade was open. Whether AMD's strong results logically imply NVDA weakness is dubious as a rationale, but the data here can't settle causation, only that the direction worked. Timing: Entry was not late — NVDA was only down 0.35% from prior close with essentially no move in the last 30 minutes, so the move had not already happened. Exit: The exit was near-optimal — the realized gain (~0.79% on the short) matches the best unrealized of +0.79%, meaning the trade captured essentially all of what was available. Dominant factor: correct signal with a well-timed exit that captured the full available move; this trade worked as intended, even if the entry rationale's logic (AMD strength → NVDA short) is questionable on its face. |