

The Supreme Court is set to decide whether to allow App Store commission rate proceedings to continue after findings that CEO Tim Cook directed an anticompetitive strategy and executives lied under oath.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AAPL | ○ skip | — | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short AAPL (regulatory: The Supreme Court is set to decide whether to allow App Store commission rate proceedings to continue after findings that CEO Tim Cook directed an anticompetitive strategy and executives lied under oath.) [skipped: duplicate theme — already holding S1 short AAPL exiting 2026-08-13] → close +0.60% |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | AAPL | ● enter | ▼ short | overnight drift: short AAPL at close, exit next close (regulatory: The Supreme Court is set to decide whether to allow App Store commission rate proceedings to continue after findings that CEO Tim Cook directed an anticompetitive strategy and executives lied under oath.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4 | AAPL | ▼ short | 3 | 305.16 | 305.84 | -2.04 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL S4 | +0.28% | -0.72% | Signal: wrong. The short predicted a decline on regulatory news, but AAPL rose over the holding period (entry 305.16 → exit 305.84, roughly -0.22% against the position). The max favorable move was only +0.28% versus -0.72% adverse, so the direction call was simply incorrect — the dominant factor. Timing: partly unfavorable, partly unclear. The stock was already up +0.37% at decision time (and the fill at 305.16 was ~0.96% above the prior close of 302.25, suggesting further slippage or drift into entry), but the data doesn't show whether any anticipated news-driven selloff had already occurred and reversed before entry. Exit: near the middle of the range. The -0.22% realized loss sits between the +0.28% best and -0.72% worst unrealized — the exit avoided the worst but a small profit was briefly available; still, the tiny favorable range confirms the thesis never really worked, so exit mechanics were secondary to the bad signal. |