

Supermicro CEO announced a partnership to build a gigawatt-scale AI data center for SpaceX with a targeted completion in 2027.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | SMCI | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict REPRICING, direction bullish -> buy SMCI (partnership: Supermicro CEO announced a partnership to build a gigawatt-scale AI data center for SpaceX with a targeted completion in 2027.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | NVDA | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for NVDA → close -0.87% |
| S4 | SMCI | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: buy SMCI at close, exit next close (partnership: Supermicro CEO announced a partnership to build a gigawatt-scale AI data center for SpaceX with a targeted completion in 2027.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | SMCI | ▲ long | 40 | 24.34 | 24.34 | 0.00 | closed |
| S4 | SMCI | ▲ long | 41 | 24.34 | 23.82 | -21.32 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMCI S1 | +3.35% | -0.16% | Entry vs. outcome: The REPRICING verdict was arguably too strong for a partnership with a 2027 completion date — that's a long-dated catalyst with no near-term earnings impact, so the pop was always likely to fade. The trade actually validated the direction briefly (+3.35% unrealized) but the exit logic captured none of it, round-tripping to breakeven. Improvement: Either (a) downgrade multi-year-horizon partnership announcements from REPRICING to a weaker verdict unless there's a quantified revenue/backlog figure attached, or (b) if you keep the entry, add a mechanical partial take-profit or trailing stop (e.g., bank half at +2.5%) since news-pop trades like this predictably mean-revert — leaving +3.35% MFE on the table to exit flat is an exit-rule failure as much as an entry-rule one. |
| SMCI S4 | +1.89% | -2.24% | Entry vs. outcome: The rationale bet on overnight drift from a splashy but vague partnership headline (gigawatt-scale, 2027 completion — no revenue, no timeline that matters), and the market agreed it was hype: the stock never got more than +1.9% ahead and closed down -2.1%. News this speculative and far-dated is typically fully priced in by the close you're buying at, so you were holding pure overnight noise with no edge. Improvement: Add a materiality filter to the entry rule — only take the overnight-drift trade if the catalyst has a quantifiable near-term financial impact (signed contract with dollar value, delivery within ~12 months) and the stock closed up on above-average volume that day, confirming the market is actually treating it as news rather than a press release. |