

Amazon in talks to buy Decart for $7B, weeks after Anthropic walked away from a $6B deal -- TFN
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AMZN | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long AMZN (m&a: Amazon in talks to buy Decart for $7B, weeks after Anthropic walked away from a $6B deal -- TFN) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | AMZN | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: long AMZN at close, exit next close (m&a: Amazon in talks to buy Decart for $7B, weeks after Anthropic walked away from a $6B deal -- TFN) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 85 long lost to mat 89 long (decision 29140) for S4 AMZN exiting 2026-10-13] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AMZN | ▲ long | 3 | 263.25 | 259.45 | -11.40 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN S1 | 0.00% | -1.49% | Signal — wrong, and dominant. Long AMZN on the Decart M&A headline never traded above the 263.25 fill (best unrealized -0.00%) and closed at 259.45, -1.44%; the acquirer-buys-target thesis simply didn't produce upside, which is the whole story here. Timing — partly adverse at fill, otherwise unsettled. Decision-time context was flat-to-down (-0.19% vs prev close 262.43 ≈ 261.93), yet the fill printed at 263.25, about +0.5% above the decision price, so some pop occurred between decision and fill; whether the news itself had already been absorbed earlier can't be determined from this data. Exit — near the worst but nothing better existed. -11.40 USD (-1.44%) versus a worst of -1.49% and a best of 0.00%: the exit gave back almost the full drawdown, but with no positive excursion at any point there was no profit to capture — the loss is a signal failure, not an exit failure. |