
Samsung’s $80B Quarterly Profit Tops Nvidia, AMD’s Lisa Su Shops In Seoul
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | - | ○ skip | — | no primary ticker in universe |
| S2 | AMD | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for AMD → close -2.86% |
| S3 | NVDA | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short NVDA (earnings: Samsung’s $80B Quarterly Profit Tops Nvidia, AMD’s Lisa Su Shops In Seoul) [closed early: netted out by outranking S2 long NVDA decision 27514] |
| S4 | - | ○ skip | — | no primary ticker in universe |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S3 | NVDA | ▼ short | 4 | 234.00 | 236.71 | -10.84 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA S3 | +0.03% | -1.28% | Signal: Wrong over the holding period. The short was entered at 234.0 and NVDA rose to 236.71; the best the position ever showed was +0.03%, so the bearish call never got any confirmation. (Whether the underlying article — Samsung's profit beating Nvidia's — is even a directional catalyst for NVDA is not something this data settles; the rationale asserts bearish, the tape said otherwise.) Timing: Partially stale. At decision time NVDA was already -0.91% from the prior close, and the fill at 234.0 was lower still (~-1.4% vs. 237.42), so the short was taken after a dip rather than ahead of one, and the stock then reverted upward. Exit: The close was not a judgment call — the position was netted out by a higher-ranked opposing long (decision 27514). It realized -1.16% (-10.84 USD), nearly the full worst unrealized of -1.28%, so the exit captured almost the worst available outcome, but there was essentially no better outcome to capture (+0.03% max). Dominant factor: the direction was simply wrong; the forced exit from the conflicting long only determined how much of the loss was locked in. |