Sun Oct-18 15:11:49
times in Europe/Lisbon

🚨 Alert #6302 Thu Oct-01 19:50:33

AMD, Meta Power GAMR's Gaming Index as Capcom Joins
etftrends.com · Thu Oct-01 19:45:42 published · Thu Oct-01 19:50:33 alerted · alerted 4m after publish · read at www.etftrends.com ↗ · m&a · mat 86

AMD, Meta Power GAMR's Gaming Index as Capcom Joins

🎯 Tickers & verdicts

tickerdirectionverdictsince close30mday loday hiintraday px
primary AMD▲ bullishFRESH+0.93%+0.49%604.62619.62
peer META▲ bullishFRESH+0.18%-0.21%699.90731.76

🧭 Decisions

strategytickeractionsiderationale
S1AMD○ skip—verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long AMD (m&a: AMD, Meta Power GAMR's Gaming Index as Capcom Joins) [skipped: duplicate theme — already holding S2 long AMD exiting 2026-10-01] → close -0.03%
S2-○ skip—no counterparty in universe
S3META● enter▲ longverdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long META (m&a: AMD, Meta Power GAMR's Gaming Index as Capcom Joins)
S4AMD○ skip—overnight drift: long AMD at close, exit next close (m&a: AMD, Meta Power GAMR's Gaming Index as Capcom Joins) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 86 long lost to mat 90 long (decision 25128) for S4 AMD exiting 2026-10-02]

📈 Trades

strategytickersideqtyentryexitP&L $status
S3META▲ long1727.20725.23-1.97closed

Retrospectives

tickermfemaereflection
META S3+0.33%-0.26%

Signal was weak-to-wrong: a "Capcom joins a gaming index" story is a thin bullish catalyst for META, and the stock ended below the 727.2 entry (exit 725.23, −0.27%), so the predicted direction did not hold over the trade's life. Timing: the pre-entry context (+0.18% from prev close, −0.21% last 30m) shows essentially no move had occurred, so this was not a chased entry — though the fill at 727.2 was ~0.19% above the quoted context, meaning some drift happened between decision and fill. Exit: the trade touched +0.33% and −0.26% while open and closed at roughly the worst unrealized, so the exit captured none of the available upside; the data here doesn't show whether that was a stop, a time exit, or a reversal, so the exit mechanism itself can't be judged.

Dominant factor: a flimsy signal — the catalyst had no clear link to META's price, and the small range (+0.33%/−0.26%) suggests the "news" never moved the stock at all.

📖 Glossary

  • S1 primary — trades the alert's primary ticker in the direction the article itself indicates; exits at the same day's close.
  • S2 counterparty — trades the inferred counterparty ticker (weakest signal, LLM-inferred sympathy); exits at the same day's close.
  • S3 peer — trades an inferred peer ticker (also LLM-inferred sympathy); exits at the same day's close.
  • S4 overnight — holds the primary ticker from today's close to the NEXT day's close.
  • Verdicts are decided top-to-bottom, first match wins; REPRICING is also the fallback when nothing else matches (2026-08-08 #220).
  • UNKNOWN — a needed price input (move since close or move in the last 30m) is missing.
  • PRICED — |move since previous close| ≥ 2.0%: already reflected in price.
  • REPRICING — |move in the last 30m| ≥ 0.5%: the tape is actively moving on it. Also covers a quieter move — |move since previous close| in [1.0, 2.0) with a quiet last-30m tape: still developing, not yet priced.
  • FRESH — |move since previous close| < 1.0%: a genuinely new move.
  • materiality — how market-moving the story was judged, 0-100 — alerts require materiality ≥ 70.

← #6301 · #6303 → · 📅 2026-10-01 day report