

Tesla formally unveiled the production version of its steering-wheel-free Cybercab robotaxi, driving its market valuation to between $1.2 and $1.5 trillion.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSLA | ● enter | ▲ long | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long TSLA (product: Tesla formally unveiled the production version of its steering-wheel-free Cybercab robotaxi, driving its market valuation to between $1.2 and $1.5 trillion.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | TSLA | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long TSLA at close, exit next close (product: Tesla formally unveiled the production version of its steering-wheel-free Cybercab robotaxi, driving its market valuation to between $1.2 and $1.5 trillion.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSLA | ▲ long | 2 | 377.64 | 378.49 | +1.70 | closed |
| S4 | TSLA | ▲ long | 2 | 378.55 | 372.76 | -11.58 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA S1 | +1.43% | -0.46% | Signal: correct — price did move up after entry, validating the bullish call at least directionally. Timing: the price context (-0.89% since prev close, flat last 30m) shows no pop was underway at entry, but this data can't settle whether the robotaxi news itself was already priced in from an earlier session — the "FRESH" verdict is unverifiable here. Exit: this is the dominant factor — the trade banked +1.70 (~+0.11%) while the position saw +1.43% unrealized (~+$10.8 on 2 shares), so the exit captured under a tenth of the available favorable move despite only -0.46% adverse excursion. |
| TSLA S4 | +1.83% | -2.83% | Signal: Wrong at the horizon that matters — the trade lost -1.53% (378.55 → 372.76), so the predicted overnight drift didn't materialize by exit. The +1.83% best unrealized shows the direction was briefly right intraday, but not at the mechanical next-close exit. Timing: The data can't fully settle this — price was only -0.89% since prev close at entry, but we don't see how much the Cybercab news had already been priced in over prior sessions, which is the relevant question for a headline-driven entry. Exit: The fixed next-close exit gave back the entire +1.83% favorable excursion and landed near (though not at) the -2.83% worst; it captured roughly the middle-to-bad end of what was available. Dominant factor: Signal failure — the bullish news-drift thesis simply didn't hold over the holding period, and the loss reflects the direction being wrong at exit, not a botched exit off a good call. |