

Nvidia reported Q2 fiscal 2027 revenue of $96.22 billion, beating estimates by 4.51%, and guided Q3 revenue to $108 billion while highlighting strong margins and cash flow.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | NVDA | ○ skip | — | verdict FRESH, direction bullish -> long NVDA (earnings: Nvidia reported Q2 fiscal 2027 revenue of $96.22 billion, beating estimates by 4.51%, and guided Q3 revenue to $108 billion while highlighting strong margins and cash flow.) [skipped: signal conflict — wanted long, conflict-hold — mat 85 ties incumbent S1 short NVDA, incumbent held (strictly higher materiality required to flip)] → close +0.13% |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | AMD | ○ skip | — | direction unclear for AMD → close +1.14% |
| S4 | NVDA | ● enter | ▲ long | overnight drift: long NVDA at close, exit next close (earnings: Nvidia reported Q2 fiscal 2027 revenue of $96.22 billion, beating estimates by 4.51%, and guided Q3 revenue to $108 billion while highlighting strong margins and cash flow.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4 | NVDA | ▲ long | 4 | 228.73 | 225.15 | -14.32 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA S4 | +0.29% | -2.05% | Signal (dominant factor): wrong. The post-earnings drift thesis failed — despite the beat, NVDA fell ~1.57% from entry to exit; the predicted direction simply didn't materialize. Timing: Entry at 228.73 was +0.59% above prior close, so a small part of any pop was already paid for at the fill, but that ~0.6% premium is minor compared to the directional loss. Exit: The best unrealized was only +0.29%, so there was essentially no profit ever available; the -1.57% realized exit sits between the best and worst (-2.05%), meaning the mechanical close-to-close exit gave back nothing meaningful and avoided the trough — the loss was driven by the bad signal, not exit execution. |