

Tesla's Q2 2026 net income was primarily driven by a $1.01 billion unrealized gain on its SpaceX stake rather than automotive operating profits.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSLA | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict REPRICING, direction bearish -> short TSLA (earnings: Tesla's Q2 2026 net income was primarily driven by a $1.01 billion unrealized gain on its SpaceX stake rather than automotive operating profits.) |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | TSLA | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: short TSLA at close, exit next close (earnings: Tesla's Q2 2026 net income was primarily driven by a $1.01 billion unrealized gain on its SpaceX stake rather than automotive operating profits.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 65 short lost to mat 65 long (decision 17712) for S4 TSLA exiting 2026-09-11] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSLA | ▼ short | 2 | 358.21 | 363.19 | -9.96 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA S1 | -0.52% | -2.92% | Signal: Unconfirmed post-entry — TSLA never traded below the entry price while the position was open (best unrealized was still -0.52%), so the data shows no bearish follow-through, though whether the thesis was "wrong" versus already priced in can't be fully separated here. Timing: This is the dominant factor. The stock was already down 1.26% at decision time and filled at 358.21 (roughly -2.6% from prev close), meaning the short was entered after the repricing had largely occurred; the trade was underwater from the start. Exit: Reasonable given what was available — the -1.39% realized loss sits between the best (-0.52%) and worst (-2.92%) unrealized marks, so the exit avoided the worst of the adverse move; there was never a profit to capture. |