

Qualcomm and Amazon announced a multi-generational partnership to develop custom AI silicon for AWS data centers, including a $4 billion warrant investment by Amazon in Qualcomm.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | QCOM | ○ skip | — | verdict REPRICING, direction bullish -> long QCOM (partnership: Qualcomm and Amazon announced a multi-generational partnership to develop custom AI silicon for AWS data centers, including a $4 billion warrant investment by Amazon in Qualcomm.) [skipped: duplicate theme — already holding S1 long QCOM exiting 2026-09-09] → close +0.45% |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | AVGO | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict REPRICING, direction bearish -> short AVGO (partnership: Qualcomm and Amazon announced a multi-generational partnership to develop custom AI silicon for AWS data centers, including a $4 billion warrant investment by Amazon in Qualcomm.) |
| S4 | QCOM | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: long QCOM at close, exit next close (partnership: Qualcomm and Amazon announced a multi-generational partnership to develop custom AI silicon for AWS data centers, including a $4 billion warrant investment by Amazon in Qualcomm.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 75 long lost to mat 85 long (decision 17248) for S4 QCOM exiting 2026-09-10] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S3 | AVGO | ▼ short | 2 | 364.04 | 364.01 | +0.06 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO S3 | +0.19% | -0.34% | Signal: Directionally plausible but essentially unconfirmed after entry — the stock went nowhere while the trade was open (range +0.19% to -0.34%), so the data doesn't validate the bearish thesis so much as show it was inert. Timing: This is the dominant factor: AVGO was already down 1.22% from prior close at decision time (and ticking back up +0.52% in the last 30m), so the repricing the trade sought had largely happened before entry. Exit: The +0.06 USD result (~0.01%) captured almost none of the modest +0.19% best available, but with so little movement on offer there was little to capture — a near-scratch on a trade whose edge had already been consumed pre-entry. |