

The Tech Transparency Project reported that Meta ran over 300 paid advertisements containing child sexual abuse imagery.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | META | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short META (regulatory: The Tech Transparency Project reported that Meta ran over 300 paid advertisements containing child sexual abuse imagery.) [closed early: netted out by outranking S2 long META decision 16918] |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | META | ○ skip | — | overnight drift: short META at close, exit next close (regulatory: The Tech Transparency Project reported that Meta ran over 300 paid advertisements containing child sexual abuse imagery.) [skipped at close: outranked — mat 65 short lost to mat 65 long (decision 17008) for S4 META exiting 2026-09-09] |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | META | ▼ short | 1 | 617.56 | 617.75 | -0.19 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| META S1 | +0.62% | -0.57% | Signal: Partially right — the short saw up to +0.62% unrealized gain while open, so a bearish move did materialize; notably, though, the system simultaneously generated a long META signal (decision 16918), so the strategy itself was conflicted on direction. Timing: No evidence of chasing — price was roughly flat at entry (-0.27% since prev close, +0.24% last 30m), so the move had not already occurred. Exit: This is the dominant factor. The trade was closed early by being netted out against the opposing long decision, not by any market-based exit, and it surrendered a +0.62% available gain to book a -0.19 USD loss near the worst of the range. The internal signal conflict, not the market read, drove the outcome. |