

Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving systems face renewed regulatory scrutiny following two fatal crashes where vehicles stopped unexpectedly on freeways with driver-assist technology engaged.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | TSLA | ○ skip | — | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short TSLA (regulatory: Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving systems face renewed regulatory scrutiny following two fatal crashes where vehicles stopped unexpectedly on freeways with driver-assist technology engaged.) [skipped: duplicate theme — already holding S1 short TSLA exiting 2026-09-02] → close +1.05% |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | - | ○ skip | — | no peer in universe |
| S4 | TSLA | ● enter | ▼ short | overnight drift: short TSLA at close, exit next close (regulatory: Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving systems face renewed regulatory scrutiny following two fatal crashes where vehicles stopped unexpectedly on freeways with driver-assist technology engaged.) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4 | TSLA | ▼ short | 2 | 356.33 | 376.70 | -40.74 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA S4 | +0.30% | -7.74% | Signal: Wrong. The short predicted downside from regulatory scrutiny, but TSLA rose ~5.7% against the position — the direction call failed outright. Timing: The stock was only down -0.94% pre-entry, so the trade wasn't chasing an already-completed move; the adverse rally happened after entry, not before. Exit: Nearly nothing was available to capture — best unrealized was just +0.30% versus a worst of -7.74%, and the exit at -5.7% actually avoided the trough. The dominant factor is plainly the signal: the thesis was directionally wrong, and no exit rule could have salvaged a trade that never went more than 0.3% in its favor. |