

AMD signed a 15-year, $14 billion agreement with Core Scientific to secure 530 MW of AI data center capacity for its Instinct GPUs and EPYC processors, with options for an additional 2 GW.
| strategy | ticker | action | side | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | AMD | ○ skip | — | verdict PRICED — Δ prev close -7.49% · Δ 30m +0.47% · px 457.86 (prev 494.95) → close -0.42% |
| S2 | - | ○ skip | — | no counterparty in universe |
| S3 | NVDA | ● enter | ▼ short | verdict FRESH, direction bearish -> short NVDA (partnership: AMD signed a 15-year, $14 billion agreement with Core Scientific to secure 530 MW of AI data center capacity for its Instinct GPUs and EPYC processors, with options for an additional 2 GW.) [closed early: netted out by outranking S1 long NVDA decision 4365] |
| S4 | AMD | ○ skip | — | verdict PRICED — Δ prev close -7.49% · Δ 30m +0.47% · px 457.86 (prev 494.95) |
| strategy | ticker | side | qty | entry | exit | P&L $ | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S3 | NVDA | ▼ short | 5 | 197.37 | 197.72 | -1.75 | closed |
| ticker | mfe | mae | reflection |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA S3 | +0.07% | -0.29% | Signal: Wrong, at least over the holding window — NVDA drifted up against the short, and the best unrealized was a negligible +0.07%, so the bearish thesis never got traction. Note the strategy itself generated a conflicting long signal (decision 4365) shortly after, which is what killed this trade. Timing: Price was only +0.31% off prior close at decision time, so this wasn't a chase of an already-completed move; the data doesn't show a big prior dislocation. Exit: The exit at -1.75 was near the worst unrealized (-0.29%), but the entire range was so tight (+0.07%/-0.29%) that there was essentially nothing to capture — and the close wasn't a strategy exit anyway, it was forced by netting against the opposing long. Dominant factor: bad signal — the bearish read on the AMD/Core Scientific news didn't play out, and the early forced exit is secondary given the trivial available range. |